May 6, 2024

What is the Secret to Successful Customer Marketing? And the 10 Customer Challenge

What is the Secret to Successful Customer Marketing?   And the 10 Customer Challenge

Send us a Text Message.

What's the best way for marketers to get better customer insights and identify blind spots?

In this episode, Chief Marketing Officer Ron Carson joins to discuss the significance of customer-driven marketing in today's business environment. 

He emphasizes the importance of direct communication with customers, a method he and Eric  credits for the most impactful marketing results throughout his 25-year career. Contrary to common practices where marketing relies on sales or customer success teams for customer feedback, Ron supports the direct engagement approach to understand market needs and preferences. 

He shares insights into using customer feedback for refining marketing strategies, enhancing messaging, and improving product and service offerings. The discussion delves into various techniques for engaging with customers, including one-on-one conversations and leveraging digital tools for organizing and analyzing customer feedback. Ron's approach advocates for a routine of regular customer interactions beyond traditional sales and marketing roles, suggesting a '10 Customer Challenge' for marketers seeking to gain deeper market insights and identify blind spots.

Visit the Remarkable Marketing Podcast website to see all our episodes.

Visit the Remarkable Marketing Podcast on YouTube

00:49 The Power of Customer Conversations in Marketing

02:54 Challenges and Strategies in Customer Feedback

07:04 The Impact of Direct Customer Engagement

09:47 The Importance of One-on-One Customer Feedback

14:26 Closing Thoughts and the 10 Customer Challenge

Chapters

00:00 - Customer Feedback in Marketing Strategies

08:35 - Customer Feedback and One-on-One Conversations

15:24 - Customer-Driven Marketing Challenge Success

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:00.299 --> 00:00:01.842
Welcome to today's episode.

00:00:01.842 --> 00:00:03.846
Our guest today is Ron.

00:00:03.846 --> 00:00:08.112
He is a Chief Marketing Officer for Teradata.

00:00:08.112 --> 00:00:09.134
Welcome to the show.

00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:10.823
Thank you very much, Eric.

00:00:10.862 --> 00:00:18.019
Thanks for having me why don't we start by you sharing just a minute or two about who you are and what you do?

00:00:18.679 --> 00:00:19.861
Yeah, thank you for the introduction.

00:00:19.861 --> 00:00:23.586
As you said, I'm the chief marketing officer over here at Teradata.

00:00:23.586 --> 00:00:30.556
We sell software to higher education institutions for managing their study abroad programs and international students coming in.

00:00:30.556 --> 00:00:35.170
So it's slightly different to market than many of your listeners might be familiar with.

00:00:35.170 --> 00:00:37.179
It's probably maxed out ABM right.

00:00:37.179 --> 00:00:42.171
There's a finite number of institutions in the market and a subsegment of those are viable targets for us.

00:00:42.171 --> 00:00:43.505
So we know them all.

00:00:43.505 --> 00:00:44.545
We know them pretty well.

00:00:46.521 --> 00:00:49.390
That sounds like a very interesting challenge.

00:00:49.390 --> 00:00:58.494
So let's jump into a story about some of the best marketing you've done, the marketing that you're the most proud of.

00:00:59.420 --> 00:01:07.605
So this might be at the same time controversial and at the same time duh at the same time controversial and at the same time duh.

00:01:07.605 --> 00:01:09.992
And the thing that I'm most proud of is my marketing department talks to customers all the time.

00:01:09.992 --> 00:01:14.105
I say it's potentially controversial because it's occurred to me.

00:01:14.105 --> 00:01:18.700
I've observed in many companies marketing no longer talks to customers.

00:01:18.700 --> 00:01:22.347
In the smaller companies it's once they start up.

00:01:22.347 --> 00:01:25.772
So once they get the product out the door, it's all about iterating on the agile methodology.

00:01:25.772 --> 00:01:26.237
Right, get the product out the door.

00:01:26.237 --> 00:01:27.090
It's all about iterating on the agile methodology.

00:01:27.090 --> 00:01:29.075
Right, get the stuff out the door, we'll find out what works and what doesn't.

00:01:29.075 --> 00:01:29.756
We'll fast fail.

00:01:30.459 --> 00:01:34.640
In medium-sized companies they tend to be driven by the most recent deals they're trying to close right.

00:01:34.640 --> 00:01:36.522
That kind of dictates the voice of the market.

00:01:36.522 --> 00:01:42.046
And in the larger companies, enterprise-like marketing doesn't get to talk to customers because that's the domain of sales.

00:01:42.046 --> 00:01:42.587
They own them.

00:01:42.587 --> 00:01:51.075
So it becomes this weird thing where the people responsible for knowing the most about the market and the voice of the market don't get a chance to listen to it all that much.

00:01:52.640 --> 00:01:53.441
That's interesting.

00:01:53.441 --> 00:02:14.389
I think, unfortunately, a lot of organizations just rely on the sales team and the customer success team talking to customers to get the feedback and then filter it back, but I don't think that's the best way to do it.

00:02:14.389 --> 00:02:44.979
I think actually, in the marketing that I've done over the last 25 years, the best marketing that I've done to generate demand and the best account-based marketing I've done have come from marketing programs that include customers, like having customers speak on webinars, having customers speak at events and having, like you said, voice of the customer focus groups, and you can use things from that in your marketing.

00:02:44.979 --> 00:02:55.725
The customer-led marketing has been the best marketing that I've done for many companies, and so have you seen that in your organization Absolutely, and it's assumed for a minute.

00:02:55.866 --> 00:03:02.171
Take the statistic at face value that only 5% of your target market is in the market for your solution at any time.

00:03:02.171 --> 00:03:12.400
Right, there's 95% of the available market that's just not interested in buying right now, but marketing is responsible for staying on the radar screen of that 95%.

00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:13.545
How do you do that?

00:03:13.545 --> 00:03:33.150
I was just on a session today it was an insightful session, a panel discussion talking about all the different digital touch points and how to try to aggregate that data to get an understanding of what really motivates the customer Web traffic pages, bounce rates, the ad performance and it occurred to me this is the punchline in this whole thing.

00:03:33.330 --> 00:03:36.082
What if you could just ask what would get their attention?

00:03:36.082 --> 00:03:39.050
What if you could just ask why would they buy?

00:03:39.050 --> 00:03:39.972
Why won't they buy?

00:03:39.972 --> 00:03:55.978
And the reality is you can ask it's tricky, there's some technique to it is you can ask it's tricky, there's some technique to it, but you can't actually go out and ask these people you want to sell to and to market to, what it would take what would get their attention, what would get them to move into that kind of disposition, buying disposition.

00:03:55.978 --> 00:03:59.810
They will tell you the trick is you can't do it with any hint.

00:03:59.810 --> 00:04:03.381
No hint of any sales pressure, no ulterior motive.

00:04:03.381 --> 00:04:07.451
It's truly got to be a genuine quest for knowledge, conversation with them.

00:04:08.780 --> 00:04:10.162
Yeah, and sometimes that could be.

00:04:10.162 --> 00:04:19.935
They want a certain level of support or customer success to get set up as a new customer.

00:04:19.935 --> 00:04:22.511
It could be that they want a certain offer.

00:04:22.511 --> 00:04:23.807
It could be that they need a certain price.

00:04:23.807 --> 00:04:27.548
It could be that they need a certain price that fits their business model or certain terms.

00:04:27.548 --> 00:04:30.309
It could be any combination of those things.

00:04:30.309 --> 00:04:32.646
But I think if you don't ask, you don't know.

00:04:32.646 --> 00:04:40.307
Have you done a lot with things along the lines of voice of the customer to get structured feedback?

00:04:40.908 --> 00:04:41.411
Absolutely.

00:04:41.411 --> 00:04:53.357
One of the things that happens in a lot of companies is messaging gets off right, it becomes a little off and sometimes there's people sitting around the boardroom table wordsmithing the messaging and usually that's a recipe for disaster.

00:04:53.357 --> 00:04:55.201
Right by the time everybody around the table is happy.

00:04:55.201 --> 00:05:06.624
It doesn't resonate with anybody and that leads to things like the big bloated sales pipeline a lot of no decisions, a lot of accounts just sitting there for an extended period of time.

00:05:06.624 --> 00:05:10.180
They don't close, closed one or closed loss, they just kind of sit there.

00:05:10.180 --> 00:05:11.524
They're the long maybes.

00:05:13.187 --> 00:05:17.745
If you go out and talk to even some of them, they will tell you why is it not moving?

00:05:17.745 --> 00:05:20.091
And it's because the value proposition didn't make sense.

00:05:20.091 --> 00:05:27.447
It's not always what you think it is, it's not always an efficiency, it's not always ROI, it is a lot, but sometimes it's something else.

00:05:27.447 --> 00:05:32.151
Sometimes it's employee retention that's happened.

00:05:32.151 --> 00:05:39.733
So there's blind spots and the only way to shine a light in the dark and find those blind spots and understand what's going on is to just ask.

00:05:39.733 --> 00:05:45.713
And you can apply that on the sales and marketing end of the spectrum, on the customer journey, in the middle of the account.

00:05:45.713 --> 00:05:47.447
So is the implementation going well?

00:05:47.447 --> 00:05:48.843
Is the support.

00:05:48.843 --> 00:05:51.485
Living up to par Is customer success.

00:05:51.485 --> 00:05:59.658
Living up to the promise and you can even apply it in the former customer category and find out why they churned, so you can retroactively go back and fix those things.

00:05:59.677 --> 00:06:09.526
Yes, At some of the companies that I've been at that are doing account-based marketing strategies to enterprise accounts and varying industries.

00:06:10.185 --> 00:06:19.271
What's been interesting to watch is a lot of times when organizations haven't done this customer-led marketing and they haven't gotten this feedback from customers.

00:06:19.271 --> 00:06:29.807
The visual that I've seen from this that is somewhat horrifying is it's like planes circling the airport in terms of pipeline.

00:06:29.807 --> 00:06:49.267
You have a pipeline, you have a thousand people who are interested that have indicated interest over a certain amount of time the last, let's call it three to six months, like semi-recently but then they're not moving forward to closing and it just looks like there's a thousand planes circling the airport and you're like, what is it going to take to get them to land?

00:06:49.267 --> 00:06:52.288
And the best way to find out is to ask them.

00:06:52.288 --> 00:07:02.427
And often that's where you get the best ideas on messaging, on offers, on additional value that you can offer them.

00:07:02.427 --> 00:07:08.949
It's not always about price, but I think that's like an interesting visual that I've seen.

00:07:08.949 --> 00:07:19.081
But do you have an example of some of the customer feedback customer marketing you've done that has been most impactful for your organization?

00:07:19.081 --> 00:07:19.903
Let?

00:07:19.923 --> 00:07:24.442
me just give an illustrative example and I'll move to the middle of the customer journey.

00:07:24.442 --> 00:07:28.389
So, like an NPS score In other lives, this is an Eterra Dotta story.

00:07:28.389 --> 00:07:32.805
I've been part of the process to go and interview people that have taken a net promoter score.

00:07:32.805 --> 00:07:37.766
So this is one of those things that's designed to give you that customer feedback at scale right.

00:07:37.766 --> 00:07:39.630
So you don't have to talk to everybody.

00:07:39.630 --> 00:07:43.045
You get them to fill in a survey and you glean stuff from that.

00:07:44.629 --> 00:07:48.351
If you take the time to actually talk to a few of those people, hey, why'd you give us a low mark?

00:07:48.351 --> 00:07:49.379
Or why'd you give us a high mark?

00:07:49.379 --> 00:07:55.225
Or even some of the ones in the middle, there's a percentage of those people that don't even remember taking that little survey.

00:07:55.225 --> 00:07:55.827
Can we call it that?

00:07:55.827 --> 00:07:56.971
The little app that pops up?

00:07:56.971 --> 00:07:58.101
How would you rate us?

00:07:58.101 --> 00:07:59.946
They got a job to do.

00:07:59.946 --> 00:08:02.151
You're in the way.

00:08:02.151 --> 00:08:04.557
They're just clicking it to get it off the screen.

00:08:04.557 --> 00:08:14.891
So we've seen it happen where people have scored a net promoter score of a one and actually been quite happy, and we've seen it in the opposite end, where they've scored it as a 10, but been absolutely miserable.

00:08:14.891 --> 00:08:18.567
So it's been a complete false positive, just false signals coming from it.

00:08:18.567 --> 00:08:22.201
So it's not saying replace net promoter, score.

00:08:22.201 --> 00:08:36.174
But this overlay of just talking to the customers pre-customer, current customer, former customer it's just an extra layer of intelligence that brings just a level of insight that you don't get from a survey or from filling in a short form.

00:08:38.961 --> 00:08:43.772
Yeah, I think that, to your point, nps scores can be misleading.

00:08:43.792 --> 00:08:47.119
To your point, nps scores can be misleading.

00:08:54.039 --> 00:09:02.535
I think customer surveys or prospect surveys can be an interesting data point, but they can also give false positives, just like an NPS, because a lot of times if you have to give an incentive for people to complete the survey, sometimes people are just completing the survey to get a $20 Starbucks card or something.

00:09:02.557 --> 00:09:11.988
Completing the survey to get a $20 Starbucks card or something, or if there's no, if there's no incentive, then you get a very few people who will take 10 or 15 minutes to do it, so you don't get a lot of data.

00:09:11.988 --> 00:09:26.576
The other thing that I've seen in terms of format is um, I've done small customer feedback groups over, say, a lunch in person and I thought that those were good.

00:09:26.576 --> 00:09:46.634
I think one of the challenges that I had with those is we were asking for feedback about messaging and pricing is you do get somewhat of a bandwagon effect If someone says some, if, if one customer perspective customer says something, three or four other people want to be like oh yeah, that's right, I agree with that, but they probably wouldn't have thought of it.

00:09:46.634 --> 00:09:56.347
I'm just curious is one-on-one conversations really the best way to get feedback, in your view I believe it is right.

00:09:56.447 --> 00:10:08.153
In the group setting there's what you described, the bandwagon jumping, but there's also then the it's not everybody's personality to be a conscientious disagree or objector in a group setting like that, so the group thing can slide in.

00:10:08.153 --> 00:10:11.351
When you're doing the interviews, you really have to make it a safe space.

00:10:11.351 --> 00:10:15.562
Can I say that For them to give bad news, you really have to pull it out of them.

00:10:15.562 --> 00:10:18.215
Sometimes ask the question a couple of different ways.

00:10:18.215 --> 00:10:19.398
How could we be doing better?

00:10:19.398 --> 00:10:25.090
If you're trying to figure out what's the next topic for your content marketing strategy, you try to appeal to that 95%.

00:10:25.090 --> 00:10:27.517
What are the topics on your mind these days?

00:10:27.517 --> 00:10:29.381
What was the last marketing campaign you clicked on?

00:10:29.381 --> 00:10:29.770
Why?

00:10:29.770 --> 00:10:31.254
How could we get your attention?

00:10:31.254 --> 00:10:34.730
You can ask those questions as long as they don't think you're going to go.

00:10:34.730 --> 00:10:36.472
Hey, can I set you up with a sales rep?

00:10:36.614 --> 00:10:43.845
That's a great point about the group setting meetings, because people would want to try to do that for efficiency perspective.

00:10:43.845 --> 00:10:49.923
Oh, let's try to get the opinion of 10, 20, 30 people, whether it's in person or on a webinar.

00:10:49.923 --> 00:10:55.274
But a lot of people are really afraid to cause controversy Not me, I'm a potster.

00:10:55.274 --> 00:11:00.754
I'll go into an online discussion group and just lob a grenade in there, but not everybody.

00:11:00.754 --> 00:11:02.419
So no, I'm joking.

00:11:02.419 --> 00:11:36.434
I think that perhaps, if the key is one-on-one meetings, perhaps it's just having a goal, using some of the tools that you mentioned to make it organized to talk to three customers or five customers a week, or prospects, or a mix of those two, and if you're just talking to let's call it five prospects or customers every week and asking them a similar sort of questions one-on-one, you can assimilate a good amount of feedback.

00:11:36.475 --> 00:11:40.370
That's sincere right, absolutely, and you can.

00:11:40.370 --> 00:11:42.578
It doesn't have to be you the CMO right.

00:11:42.578 --> 00:11:46.639
Members of your department can be doing this as well and I would encourage that too.

00:11:46.639 --> 00:11:55.961
That way, if everybody has, I don't know, say, five conversations a month, two or three a week, something like that, all of a sudden as a department you get way smarter, way fast.

00:11:55.961 --> 00:12:02.163
And then the other thing this does I haven't touched on yet is it changes the dynamic of marketing around the table.

00:12:02.163 --> 00:12:03.812
You're no longer there going.

00:12:03.812 --> 00:12:07.413
Gee, I wonder what's going on in the market Sales, could you tell me Customer success?

00:12:07.432 --> 00:12:08.316
Could you tell me Support?

00:12:08.316 --> 00:12:10.436
Could you tell me Somebody tell me what's going on out there?

00:12:10.436 --> 00:12:31.940
You've actually got it firsthand and you've got 25 people that your department has spoken to recorded in something like a user bit is an application I love where you can actually record question answer, question answer in the database and then also tag things like competitive, intel or value proposition or issues right, so you can go back to it later and even ask it more questions.

00:12:31.940 --> 00:12:33.676
There's a way to scale it.

00:12:35.450 --> 00:12:41.484
Yeah, I think it does take away a lot of that us versus them, sales versus marketing.

00:12:41.484 --> 00:12:45.293
If one group is, we have the relationship with the customers.

00:12:45.293 --> 00:12:46.797
So our perspective is right.

00:12:46.797 --> 00:12:48.201
It's makes it a little bit more.

00:12:48.201 --> 00:12:49.270
You're in the same boat.

00:12:49.511 --> 00:12:50.073
And we're great.

00:12:50.073 --> 00:13:03.043
I have a great relationship with the head of sales here, our chief sales officer, so it's not that that I'm talking about here, but because of what you pay sales to do, their bias in the market is towards the shorter term stuff.

00:13:03.043 --> 00:13:06.581
How are we fixing this thing to get those deals across the road?

00:13:06.581 --> 00:13:08.397
Or it becomes a little more tactical.

00:13:08.397 --> 00:13:14.062
Marketing needs to look at a little bit farther over the horizon to really get their stuff right.

00:13:15.169 --> 00:13:45.174
Yeah, I think that there's also the fact that in sales and customer success, what I've run into is a lot of times they don't have the time to just get genuine feedback outside of a sales process because they have a quota and they're like I'm just doing everything I can to meet my quota and the people on the service success support side are like hey, I have to talk to my customers about a lot of different things.

00:13:45.174 --> 00:13:47.630
I don't even know if I can get this into the conversation.

00:13:47.630 --> 00:13:58.147
I think this is another good reason for marketing to to jump in that gap and to help, because it's genuinely hard for those other groups to do it?

00:13:58.269 --> 00:13:59.111
Yeah, absolutely.

00:13:59.111 --> 00:14:02.942
And you can drive your content strategy, your demand gen strategy.

00:14:02.942 --> 00:14:08.192
All that stuff can come from those conversations, and I also there's if you haven't done it, do it first.

00:14:08.192 --> 00:14:10.039
I call it the 10 customer challenge.

00:14:10.039 --> 00:14:11.004
Go talk to 10.

00:14:11.004 --> 00:14:11.989
You'll learn something.

00:14:11.989 --> 00:14:13.696
You got blind spots, you don't know they're there.

00:14:13.696 --> 00:14:14.760
You'll learn something.

00:14:14.760 --> 00:14:20.445
But once you get that baseline established, then it's just a constant, steady ping back from the market.

00:14:20.445 --> 00:14:25.140
You can do it a lower volume and still always be in sync with what's going on in the market.

00:14:26.605 --> 00:14:28.673
I love the 10 customer challenge idea.

00:14:28.673 --> 00:14:30.297
I encourage everyone to take that up.

00:14:30.297 --> 00:14:36.532
So just to review don't include anything about sales in it.

00:14:36.532 --> 00:14:45.304
Encourage people to do one-on-one conversations and try to do it on a regular cadence.

00:14:45.304 --> 00:14:47.895
Is there anything else that you found successful?

00:14:47.895 --> 00:14:55.023
So, thank you very much for sharing these insights about customer-driven marketing.

00:14:55.023 --> 00:14:59.234
Love these challenges for marketers out there If they want to be remarkable.

00:14:59.234 --> 00:15:01.421
I think they got to have this as part of the routine.

00:15:01.421 --> 00:15:03.216
So, Ron, thank you for being with us today.

00:15:03.216 --> 00:15:05.619
Encourage everyone to share this episode with your friends.

00:15:05.619 --> 00:15:08.116
We appreciate you being with us, Ron, today.

00:15:08.116 --> 00:15:08.578
Thank you.

Ron CarsonProfile Photo

Ron Carson

Founder & CMO

As a growth-oriented, accomplished chief marketing officer, I have deep experience driving financial and organizational success through integrated marketing campaigns, targeted branding initiatives, and creative execution. I have a record of achievement in scaling operations, developing and launching new products, aligning products with market needs, generating awareness and demand, and working closely with customers for mutual benefit. I am known for fostering innovation to drive continuous growth and improvement, integrating actionable insights with transformation goals, and delivering and sustaining value across the organization. My core areas of expertise include:

Customer Acquisition: Reach new audiences, grow customer base, improve market share, and scale revenue and profitability. Doubled Terra Dotta’s revenue from $7M to $17M over 3 years.

Market Insights: Innovative market research approaches to align company brand and offerings to underlying needs and aspirations of target audiences.

Operational Excellence: Emphasize continuous improvement across all business processes by creating a culture where management and employees are invested in business outcomes and empowered to implement change. Optimized operations for SciQuest, improving productivity, reducing redundancies, and scaling efficiency.

Demand Generation: Conceptualize long-term, education-focused marketing strategy prioritizing engagement of out-of-market buyers. Executed campaigns that realized a 44% increase in new logo business at Terra Dotta.

Brand Building:… Read More